I Think I’d Rather Be A Paidlance Writer
One of my favorite sites out there is Clients From Hell. If you’ve not been there, you really need to go have a look. Be prepared to laugh your fanny off. Oh, also be prepared to shake your head in horror, wonder and amazement.
Here is the snippet that inspired me to write this post:
“After sending two invoices for payment, I sent another and called the client when the receipt that they had received it came back.
CLIENT: Why are you calling me?
ME: You haven’t paid and this is the third invoice I’ve sent.
CLIENT: It’s even more than the last one!
ME: Yes. The contract you signed stated that I would add a late fee for payment.
CLIENT: You mean I have to actually pay you? I thought you were joking!
ME: What on earth made you think that?
CLIENT: You’re a freelancer!
ME: And…
CLIENT: Well, you work for free! If you were supposed to be paid, you’d be called a paidlancer or something!”
Wow. Pretty certain I’d be speechless at that point.
I did a bit of research to try and find the origin of the term and what I found pretty much matches what my common sense had told me.
From Wikipedia:
“The term was first used by Sir Walter Scott (1771–1832) in Ivanhoe to describe a “medieval mercenary warrior” or “free-lance” (indicating that the lance is not sworn to any lord’s services, not that the lance is available free of charge).[1] It changed to a figurative noun around the 1860s and was recognized as a verb in 1903 by authorities in etymology such as the Oxford English Dictionary. Only in modern times has the term morphed from a noun (a freelance) into an adjective (a freelance journalist), a verb (a journalist who freelances) and an adverb (she worked freelance), as well as into the noun “freelancer”.”
Well, there are certainly times when I feel like a “medieval mercenary warrior.” Who would have thought that a perfectly developed term from the 1800s would come back to bite some poor schmuck in the 21st century?
I guess we might need to start a movement, a revolt, an uprising. Decry the use of the “freelance” term and insist on being “paidlance writers.” somehow I doubt it would catch on.
The thing is, it sounds like the freelancer in this case did everything correctly. They had the client sign a contract, they invoiced and followed up correctly. I can’t imagine anything else they should have done and now it is likely they will never be paid for their hard work. That is a bummer. I have to admit that I’m having a little difficulty believing a client could be so dense, especially after signing a contract. It may just be a ruse to try and get out of paying a bill, but I bet it wouldn’t stand up in court.
I’ve never had anything quite so bizarre happen with a client. I’m wondering if any of my fellow freelance writers have ever had something like this happen.







Mark | Feb 7, 2012 | Reply
Jeeeeeeepers. In the UK, there are pubs known as Free Houses. This is because they are not tied to any one brewery. I’d like to see that prick refuse to pay a British pub landlord for his round of drinks.
Fab stuff, George.
John | Feb 7, 2012 | Reply
I would suggest taking an upfront payment of 50%, and for a new client then 100%. Sometimes people do try and scam you out, thank god there are only a few.
However “paidlancer” does sound rather good…
George Angus | Feb 8, 2012 | Reply
Hey Mark,
It would be kind of fun to watch that exchange. This story truly does boggle the mind.
Cheers
george
George Angus | Feb 8, 2012 | Reply
Hey John,
Good advice about the up front payment. The ghostwriting project I’m in the midst of put me in the position of requiring 30% up front, 30% at mid-point and 30% upon completion. It worked out very well!
George
Mark | Feb 9, 2012 | Reply
George, it didn’t work out very well. You’re missing 10%.
John | Feb 9, 2012 | Reply
Hey George, hope you don’t give away gold like that all the time…LOL
George Angus | Feb 16, 2012 | Reply
Hey I’m a word guy not a numbers guy.
Truth be told it was 3 pmnts of:
33.33333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333%
Silly boys.
George